Entertainment
Why Ugandan Musicians Should Avoid Political Factions in 2025
For an industry built on connection and expression, such divisions create unnecessary discord.
Music and politics have long been intertwined, from the protest anthems of the American civil rights movement to the anti-apartheid rhythms of South Africa’s Hugh Masekela. Songs have served as powerful advocacy tools, amplifying the marginalized’s voices and reflecting societal struggles. In Uganda, this connection runs deep whether through independence-era unity songs or the politically charged praise tunes of Idi Amin’s regime in the 1970s. As the country nears the 2026 presidential election, the intersection of music and politics has intensified, drawing artists into a highly polarized landscape. Given the risks involved, Ugandan musicians would be wise to distance themselves from political factions in 2025.
The current music scene is fraught with tension. President Yoweri Museveni’s National Resistance Movement (NRM) and Bobi Wine’s National Unity Platform (NUP) dominate the political discourse, often enlisting musicians as supporters or critics. Prominent figures like Bebe Cool and Eddy Kenzo have sided with Museveni, while others, such as King Saha, have faced backlash for their perceived opposition sympathies. King Saha’s recent assault in Ibanda after a politically charged performance is a stark reminder of these dangers. Even artist rivalries, such as Pallaso versus Alien Skin, carry political undertones, turning music into an ideological battleground. For an industry built on connection and expression, such divisions create unnecessary discord.
Why should Ugandan musicians remain neutral in 2025? First, it threatens the core essence of their craft. Music has traditionally served as a unifying force, bridging tribal and social divides with melodies and lyrics that resonate across communities. Taking political sides risks alienating a segment of their audience. Fans may turn against artists whose affiliations oppose their own. The existing NRM-opposition divide has already fractured audiences, weakening the cohesive cultural role that music plays.
Another major concern is personal safety. Uganda’s political climate is volatile, with dissenters facing significant repercussions. Opposition-aligned musicians, like Bobi Wine, have endured government crackdowns due to the rise of a rebel-like movement, while ruling-party supporters, like Bebe Cool, have faced hostility from rival factions. In such an unpredictable environment, neutrality is not just a stance. It is a safeguard against potentially life-threatening consequences.
Financially, political alignment can be detrimental. Uganda’s music industry is not particularly lucrative, relying heavily on corporate sponsorships, endorsements, and fan support. Companies prefer to remain apolitical and often avoid controversial figures. Similarly, fans may boycott artists whose political leanings they oppose. In an economy where every performance and sponsorship deal matters, choosing a side could significantly reduce an artist’s income opportunities.
Moreover, political landscapes shift. While Museveni has held power since 1986, history has shown that no regime lasts forever. Artists who tie their careers to a specific political figure or party risk irrelevance if the political tide turns. Remaining neutral allows them to sustain their careers regardless of leadership changes.
Some may argue that musicians have a duty to engage politically, citing Bobi Wine’s transition from artist to political force as proof that music can drive change. While this is true, it comes at a significant cost ie. division, career instability, and potential threats to personal safety. Musicians can still use their platforms to highlight injustices and advocate for social change without being drawn into partisan conflicts.
Ugandan musicians face a critical decision, become pawns in a political struggle or uphold their role as the nation’s cultural heartbeat. By steering clear of political factions, they can preserve artistic freedom, foster unity, and safeguard their futures. In a time when politics increasingly dictates direction, the boldest move might be to continue singing their own song.